When It’s Acceptable To Call Someone A “Slut”!

Do you trust the mainstream news media to provide accurate, objective information? Do you believe that reporters and news anchors, despite being overwhelmingly Democrats, do their best to stay neutral, just present the facts and allow the viewers to make their own conclusions?

Why don’t we take a recent issue concerning slander and calling a political opponent names and I’ll let you judge for yourself.

WARNING! The following contains vulgar language from members of the media directed at women.

  • NBC’s Jimmy Fallon’s band greets Michelle Bachmann with the song “Lyin’ Ass B*tch
  • Fox News’ Chris Wallace asks Michelle Bachmann “are you a flake?” during an interview
  • Air America’s radio talk show host Montell Williams suggests that Michelle Bachmann kill herself by decapitation.
  • Radio talk show host Robert F. Kennedy Jr. calls Republican Senator Inhofe a “prostitute” and a “call girl”.
  • MSNBC’s Ed Shultz calls radio talk show host Laura Ingraham a “right wing slut”.
  • Wisconsin radio host John “Sly” Sylvester accused Republican Lt. Governor Gov. Rebecca Kleefisch of performing “fellatio on all the talk-show hosts in Milwaukee” and said that she had “pulled a train” (a reference to group sex).
  • E! New’s affiliate Playboy published a top 10 list of conservative women who deserved to be raped or “hate f*cked”, including Michelle Bachmann.
  • Rolling Stone’s Matt Taibbi said concerning conservative writer Michelle Malkin “When I read [Malkin’s] stuff, I imagine her narrating her text, book-on-tape style, with a big, hairy set of balls in her mouth.”
  • One of President Obama’s largest contributors and frequent guest on CNN and MSNBC, Bill Maher called Sarah Palin a “dumb twat”, “c*nt”, “bimbo”, “boob” and a “MILF” (a mother I’d like to f*ck), which to the last one, CNN’s Piers Morgan laughed.
  • Comedian Louis CK, invited to headline this year’s Radio and Television Correspondents Dinner, chaired by Jay McMichael of CNN and other prominent media figures, “joked” that Sarah Palin is “holding a baby that just came out of her f*cking, disgusting c*nt, her f*cking retard-making c*nt. I hate her more than anybody.” He also tweeted that Palin is a “f*cking jackoff c*nt-face jazzy wondergirl” who “has a family of Chinese poor people living in her c*nt hole.
  • Conservative radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh called activist Sandra Fluke a “slut” and a “prostitute”.

A photo of Sarah Palin at a rally distributed by Reuters. Some say this is an example of Reuters 'objectifying' Palin with a 'strip club shot'.

Time to play the guessing game. Guess which media personality was singled out and condemned for an entire week by across the national media – ABC, CBS, NBC, CNBC, MSNBC, NPR, PBS, Associated Press, The New York Times, The Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times, and USA Today? Who’s program did the media pressure sponsors to pull their advertisements from? To whose victim did the President of the United State personally call to voice his support? Who has been widely condemned as a misogynist and accused of waging a “war on women”?

If you said “all of the above”, then that means you truly believe that the media is balanced and objective, fighting for what is right and making sure we have civil discourse in our nation. It also means you’re incredibly naive.

The truth is, only the conservative, Rush Limbaugh, has been targeted for outrage. Media personalities called for his removal from the airwaves, demanded that Republicans condemn his remarks, and brought heavy pressure to his advertisers to pull their sponsorships. Even after Rush apologized, his comments were framed as reflective on the entire conservative movement on this country and to push the label that the GOP is just a group of “rich white men”. The current ongoing narrative we hear is that Republicans hate women, want to take away their rights and move them back to the “dark ages”.

There are only two possible reasons for this glaring double standard by news media.

1. This is just an honest mistake and reporters on all the networks will now demand apologies, women rights groups will call on the FCC to remove the above programs from the airwaves and President Obama will return the $1 million Bill Maher donated to him.


2. The liberal mainstream news networks don’t give darn about objectivity and are actively working to make sure that President Obama gets reelected.

Well, it’s been about a week. To paraphrase NBC’s Matt Lauer, the silence from the left is ‘deafening’.

As any objective person looking at this situation can see, the Republican “war on women” is looking a lot more like the media’s “war on conservatives”. So the next time you hear the politics discussed on the news, remember this double standard. They want Obama to win. And they’ll try to publicly destroy anybody who tries to stand against him.


It’s Now Ethically OK to Kill Babies

There are a lot of bad things that happen in this world. Religious people say this is because humanity is detached from God. Liberals, atheists and people in the media laugh at such thinking and declare religion is soooo passé. Only nut jobs and the intolerant are religious these days. After all, if people kill in the name of God, how can religion be good?

Religious Conservative: “Without God and religion, moral values have no foundation and make no sense.”

Politically-Correct Liberal: “Pfffffttt, don’t be stupid. I know plenty of atheists who are good people and do great things for others! More than even many so-called Christians!”

Religious Conservative: “Well . . . don’t you think that maybe the reason we have so much bullying, violence and murders in school is because we kicked God, religion and even the suggestion that there is good and evil in this world out of schools?

Politically-Correct Liberal: “Seriously, I don’t know where you get your crazy ideas from. That’s why we have classes on ethics and tolerance! Stop trying to push your radical religious beliefs of others!”

Since religious people hate being called radical, they meekly bow down and let politically-correct teachers and shows like Glee teach their kids what is ethical or not.

But have you ever wondered if this was enough? If a religious person says that without God, “ethics” is flexible enough to change over time into accepting behaviors once thought horrible, are they just a stupid Bible-thumper who is close-minded and ignorant? As it turns out, and answer is “No”. They actually knew exactly what is going to happen.

Christians. How the liberal mainstream media portrays them to be.

On Feb. 23, 2012, the Journal of Medical Ethics, a leading, peer-reviewed international journal that influences the ethical decisions of medical professionals around the world, published a paper advocating “after-birth abortions”. Or in other words, infanticide should be acceptable if the baby would cause any burden on the mother (has any baby ever NOT caused any burdens on their mother?).

“ … to bring up such children (with disabilities such as Down’s syndrome) might be an unbearable burden on the family and on society as a whole, when the state economically provides for their care. On these grounds, the fact that a fetus has the potential to become a person who will have an (at least) acceptable life is no reason for prohibiting abortion. Therefore, we argue that, when circumstances occur after birth such that they would have justified abortion, what we call after-birth abortion should be permissible.

. . . Therefore, we claim that killing a newborn could be ethically permissible in all the circumstances where abortion would be. Such circumstances include cases where the newborn has the potential to have an (at least) acceptable life, but the well-being of the family is at risk.“

Remember all those crazy pro-life (or as the media sometimes calls them, “anti-choice”) people predicting that our abortion culture being pushed by feminists and liberals will cause us to lose respect for life? It turns out crossing that line between killing babies in the womb and out of the womb wasn’t that hard to cross after all. It’s actually very logical to liberals and all non-religious people. If you think about it, the only difference between a ‘fetus’ and an ‘infant’ is a few minutes and a couple inches of flesh.

“Hold on Burn Adams!” you might say. “This is only a paper published in a leading international medical journal of ethics! No one will be influenced in America!”

Actually, our very own Barack Obama voted FOUR times against laws that would protect babies who survived abortions from being killed. Like the paper’s authors argued, Obama said he didn’t want to “burden” mothers with having to take care of their child. Instead, let nature take its course and the babies will starve or freeze to death within 8 hours. Think this is horrible and unthinkable that this is happening? Well, as Obama and the rest of the Democrats in this country made quite clear this month, leave the moral judgements up to the government and just do as you’re told.

So welcome to a world without religion or God. If we re-elect Obama or any other of his liberal comrades, we wouldn’t have to worry about the “wall of separation” between church and state. God and every other moral value would be surgically removed like tumors from the now all-powerful federal government.

But go ahead and don’t believe what I’m saying. Don’t even believe the facts that popping up all around you and are being purposefully ignored by the liberal mainstream media.

After all, I must be just another one of those extreme right-wing religious fanatics that NBC and CNN warned you about.